I’m not “claiming" that Bitcoin is terrible. I’m showing you why it is non-functional as a currency with sources to all my statements (see the first paragraph).

It doesn’t make sense to group NANO with all the other alt-coins, because all the other alt-coins are just forks of Bitcoin or similar in design. “All the other alt-coins" rely on a single shared block-chain with miners for consensus. This structure means that the rise in fees are directly coupled with increased adoption. In other words, Bitcoin and it’s forks can never become widely adopted. It has hit the ceiling. Steam tried it and stepped away.

Obscene fees and hours-long waiting times are not the future of money. Bitcoin still has first mover advantage and it has mainstream awareness which causes it to be ahead. You focus too much on the market cap. Look at the tech. Look at the fundamentals. Bitcoin would of course be a better form of money if it was feeless, instant, energy-efficient, scalable and more decentralized. NANO achieves all of this and on some days the network confirms more transactions than BTC, ETH, and LTC combined:

There’s no need to be loyal to a brand in the world of computer protocols. Only thing that matters is what is delivered.